![]() (tonymac86 forum has a Unibeast installer thread with the guide last edited in 2016) Since there is not much information on building a current (2018, Coffee Lake) machine and running 10.8.5, I've hit a roadblock in my research. OR just have a pretty decent machine for Logic Pro X, which is ok but since the aim is for a recording/mixing system with minimal latency is not great. Plan C is not very preferable, which is ditching the old Pro Tools system for a newer version that's compatible with an OS that works with the hardware, losing compatibility for a 96 input 48 output hardware system and all of the RTAS and TDM plugins. Plan B is if the HD cards do not want to work well via PCIe I could still plug in via a thunderbolt enclosure. ![]() Plan A is to ideally dual boot Mountain Lion AND Sierra for access to both Pro Tools HD 10.3.10 and Logic Pro X 10.4 (Using USB or Thunderbolt Interface) I am open to just using internal graphics and adding more ram later. Zotac - GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB Mini Video Cardįractal Design - Define R6 White TG ATX Mid Tower CaseĬorsair - RMx 850W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply ![]() Samsung - 960 EVO 250GB M.2-2280 Solid State Drive 1.0) ATX LGA1151 MotherboardĬrucial - Ballistix Sport LT 16GB (1 x 16GB) DDR4-2400 Memory Intel - Core i7-8700K 3.7GHz 6-Core ProcessorĬorsair - H115i PRO 55.4 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler Prospective parts list is as follows, I pulled mostly from 's buyer's guide and Hackintosher's guides on getting the right motherboard with inbuilt wifi that can be replaced with a broadcom card, have a TB3 Header and support for Alpine Ridge, AND have enough PCIe slots for the Avid/Digidesign expansion cards. It isn't a latency manager or somesuch.So i'm building a Hackintosh to replace my recording studio's aging 2008 Mac Pro that runs Pro Tools HD 10.3.10 on Mountain Lion and my aim is to build a Mountain Lion machine with the best possible CPU, memory and storage performance. Reaper has the ability use it as an audio device just like core audio in OSX or a proprietary driver for some connected external audio interface. You set the buffer (block size) to the highest latency that still falls below perception and the hardware (computer/interface) either can keep up or not.ĪSIO is the Windows core audio driver. Live performance/sound latency ultimately depends on the capabilities of the hardware in the system. Use the driver reported latency value or not with an offset to match that noted latency. Have you done a loopback test to see the actual latency? (There's no reason to guess.) Where did you get those values you tried to enter? It looks like you've found the preference setting for the 2nd thing. Or recording overdubs and having them line up with previous tracks? ![]() Monitoring live sound for live performance or live sound reinforcement? My recordings work great with every other DAW out there. Why was Reaper designed with such a huge problem? "audio driver reported latency" by adding "400.00 ms + 1723" samples to Output and "-550.00 ms + 1723" samples to Input. I see everyone gets ASIO for Windows which solves THEIR problems, but I can't find ANYTHING that solves it for MAC. I've set up mostly everything else that I need, customized, etc. I've spent over 2 weeks reading and watching everything I can about the latency problems with reaper. I really want to see what all the excitement is over Reaper, is it really a slicker, faster editing DAW to work with? I can create demos, add other tracks, bus them to stereo. I was really looking for something that wouldn't have the Samples/Buffer problem that I keep having in ProTools 12.5.2 - which in all other ways works amazing. I've heard all these amazing things about Reaper for Voice Over work.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |